The Incredible Hulk is one of the most imposing characters in comics history to date. The character is also very popular among fans, too popular in fact that the name has been associated to anything that is similar to the Hulk.
And as with any other other popular comic book characters, the Incredible Hulk was bound to have spin-offs in other media. Thus, there are several cartoons released by Marvel (who created the title) over the course of its history. There was also a live action TV Series (yes, a show with real actors!) in the 70's, which is in fact the one of the most famous adaptations. And then there are the movies.
While the TV series was aired way back in the seventies, it took more than three decades to get a movie on the works. This one is particularly attributed to the lack of special effects capabilities back then. Banner only rips his clothes and turned green in the TV series, not changing in size.
To date, there are two movies produced on the Hulk. The Hulk was shown 2003, while the Incredible Hulk was shown in 2008. interestingly, both films are not sequels of each other. Instead they are alternate takes on the Hulk's origin story.
The first Hulk film was directed by Ang Lee, known for Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. Consistent on Lee's style, the film presented a more psychological and emotional take on how Banner became the hulk. Thus the story is somewhat more concerned on the inner struggles of Banner as the Hulk. than with action. It would also be interesting to note that Lee's body movements were the ones used for the Hulk.
On the other hand, the 2008 movie did a more straightforward action movie and focused less on psychology. The movie was also much closer to the TV series than the first one. This, many say, is more closer to the Hulk of the comics than the other one.
Aside from story treatment, the most notable differences is the depiction of the Hulk. The first movie is pretty much closer to the original comics. However, his appearance is consider by some as being too close to the point that it looked cartoonish. On the other hand, the second film's version uses a less saturated color, making his appearance more life-like. The edge of the first version over the second is more dramatic movements (since it's based on Ang Lee's), which some compare to the ones seen in King Kong.
There is actually no way to say which one is better. People wanting to see a much deeper story to the Hulk would probably go for the first one. On the other hand, those looking for fast paced action will go for the second. Any which way you think it though, both movies are definitely a delight to watch.
Image sources:
http://www.buyurburdanindir.com
http://www.collider.com
And as with any other other popular comic book characters, the Incredible Hulk was bound to have spin-offs in other media. Thus, there are several cartoons released by Marvel (who created the title) over the course of its history. There was also a live action TV Series (yes, a show with real actors!) in the 70's, which is in fact the one of the most famous adaptations. And then there are the movies.
While the TV series was aired way back in the seventies, it took more than three decades to get a movie on the works. This one is particularly attributed to the lack of special effects capabilities back then. Banner only rips his clothes and turned green in the TV series, not changing in size.
To date, there are two movies produced on the Hulk. The Hulk was shown 2003, while the Incredible Hulk was shown in 2008. interestingly, both films are not sequels of each other. Instead they are alternate takes on the Hulk's origin story.
The first Hulk film was directed by Ang Lee, known for Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. Consistent on Lee's style, the film presented a more psychological and emotional take on how Banner became the hulk. Thus the story is somewhat more concerned on the inner struggles of Banner as the Hulk. than with action. It would also be interesting to note that Lee's body movements were the ones used for the Hulk.
On the other hand, the 2008 movie did a more straightforward action movie and focused less on psychology. The movie was also much closer to the TV series than the first one. This, many say, is more closer to the Hulk of the comics than the other one.
Aside from story treatment, the most notable differences is the depiction of the Hulk. The first movie is pretty much closer to the original comics. However, his appearance is consider by some as being too close to the point that it looked cartoonish. On the other hand, the second film's version uses a less saturated color, making his appearance more life-like. The edge of the first version over the second is more dramatic movements (since it's based on Ang Lee's), which some compare to the ones seen in King Kong.
There is actually no way to say which one is better. People wanting to see a much deeper story to the Hulk would probably go for the first one. On the other hand, those looking for fast paced action will go for the second. Any which way you think it though, both movies are definitely a delight to watch.
Image sources:
http://www.buyurburdanindir.com
http://www.collider.com
No comments:
Post a Comment